The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannie, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Flouret, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannie, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Flouret, G.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 142, Issue 8 2608-2616, Copyright © 1989 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Encephalitogenic and proliferative responses of Lewis rat lymphocytes distinguished by position 75- and 80-substituted peptides of myelin basic protein

MD Mannie, PY Paterson, DC U'Prichard and G Flouret
Department of Microbiology-Immunology, Medical School, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611.

The encephalitogenic and proliferative responses of Lewis rat lymphocytes were defined by use of synthetic peptide GP68-84, representing the 68-84 sequence of guinea pig myelin basic protein (GPMBP), and otherwise identical peptides containing substitutions of either A75 or P80 residues. The comparative activities of these peptides were tested in the following bioassays: 1) active induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), 2) potentiation of EAE transfer activity by MBP- or peptide-sensitized lymph node cells (LNC), 3) in vitro proliferation of MBP- or peptide-sensitized LNC, and 4) in vitro proliferation of an encephalitogenic T cell line. The GP68-84 peptide exhibited potent activity in all four bioassays. In contrast, [A75]GP68-84 and [P80]GP68-84 exhibited a selective loss of certain activities while retaining activity in other bioassays. For example, LNC were activated by culture with [A75]GP68-84 to express potentiated EAE transfer activity. Furthermore, [A75]GP68-84 and GP68-84 were equipotent in stimulating the proliferation of the encephalitogenic T cell line. However, [A75]GP68-84 was virtually inactive in assays measuring the induction of EAE or the proliferation of either GPMBP- or [A75]GP68-84-sensitized LNC. Conversely, the [P80]GP68-84 peptide actively induced EAE and potentiated EAE cellular transfer activity but was incapable of stimulating proliferation of either GPMBP-sensitized LNC or an encephalitogenic T cell line. When [P80]GP68-84 was used for sensitization, in vitro proliferation of LNC was stimulated, but only by MBP sequences containing a P80 substitution. Overall, these results indicate that at least two structurally distinct T cell determinants of GP68-84 regulate functionally diverse encephalitogenic and proliferative activities of EAE-associated T cells.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
F. C. Westall
Molecular mimicry revisited: gut bacteria and multiple sclerosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2006; 44(6): 2099 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1989 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1989 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.