The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kilchherr, E.
Right arrow Articles by Curtiss, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kilchherr, E.
Right arrow Articles by Curtiss, L. K.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 138, Issue 3 849-855, Copyright © 1987 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Kinetics of C1 activation by a monoclonal anti-C1q antibody and its (Fab)2 fragments

E Kilchherr, VN Schumaker, AC Bianchino and LK Curtiss

Monoclonal antibody 1H11, which binds to the "head" portion of C1q, has been shown to be a strong, stoichiometric activator of C1, the first component of human complement, maximal activation being achieved at a ratio of one antibody-combining site per one C1q head; moreover, this activation occurs even in the presence of C1-inhibitor, as reported previously. In the present paper, the kinetics of activation are shown to be biphasic; that is, a portion of the C1 is activated very rapidly, and the remainder slowly. These two processes can be separated by the order of mixing of preincubated components; thus, only the rapid activation rate is observed if C1q and the monoclonal antibody are preincubated together and are added subsequently to a mixture of C1r2C1S2 and C1-inhibitor. Only the slow activation rate is observed when C1q, C1r2C1S2, and C1-inhibitor are preincubated and are added subsequently to monoclonal antibody 1H11. Similar results are obtained by using either the intact 1H11 antibody or else the (Fab)2 obtained from it by proteolytic digestion and purification. The rapid phase is independent of the concentration of 1H11 over the range employed; the slow phase depends on 1H11 concentration. Plausible activation schemes are presented to explain the two distinct activation rate processes, and kinetic models are developed which provide a reasonable simulation of the experimental data.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1987 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1987 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.