The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Finkelman, F. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Finkelman, F. D.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 138, Issue 12 4085-4092, Copyright © 1987 by American Association of Immunologists

ARTICLES

The Mlsd-defined primary mixed lymphocyte reaction: a composite response to Mlsa and Mlsc determinants

JJ Ryan, JJ Mond and FD Finkelman

Considerable disagreement exists among immunologists regarding the polymorphic nature of the murine Mls system. An estimate of the capacity of a given putative Mls allelic gene product expressed on a stimulator population to elicit proliferation of H-2-compatible Mls- disparate unprimed T cells may vary widely among different groups of investigators. This laboratory has shown previously that preactivation of B lymphocytes in a splenocyte stimulator population by exposure to goat anti-mouse IgD (GaMD) before irradiation dramatically enhanced the in vitro presentation not only of the strongly stimulatory (and highly cross-reactive) Mlsa and Mlsd, but also the more poorly stimulatory Mlsc specificity. Therefore, by the use of GaMD-treated splenocytes that optimally present the various Mls non-H-2 stimulatory epitopes, we attempted in this study to obtain a clearer understanding of Mls polymorphism by re-examining the conflicting claims associated with the mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) stimulatory capacity of different Mls specificities. Among H-2k responder cells of the Mls null, Mlsa, Mlsb, or Mlsd genotypes, only T cells from Mlsd-bearing CBA/J mice did not respond to Mlsc determinants present on GaMD-treated C3H/HeJ stimulator cells. Crossing CBA/J with an Mlsc-responsive mouse strain yielded an F1 animal in which nonresponsiveness to Mlsc was dominant. Although Mlsa (AKR/J) and Mlsc (C3H/HeJ) parental T cells both proliferated vigorously to Mlsd (CBA/J) stimulator cells, the Mlsa/c (AKR X C3H)F1 T cells responded poorly to GaMD-treated Mlsd stimulator cells. In addition, Mlsd (CBA/J) T cells were nonresponsive to Mlsa (AKR/J), Mlsc (C3H/HeJ), and Mlsa/c (AKR X C3H)F1 GaMD-treated stimulator cells. Because Mlsa (AKR/J) and Mlsc (C3H/HeJ) specificities are mutually stimulatory, at least limited polymorphism must exist in the Mls system. However, because Mlsa/c (AKR X C3H) and Mlsd (CBA/J) specificities are mutually nonstimulatory, T cell proliferation in an Mlsd-defined primary MLR is most likely due to a composite response to Mlsa and Mlsc epitopes present on CBA/J stimulator cells.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1987 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1987 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.