The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knop, J.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaeyer-Guignard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knop, J.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaeyer-Guignard, J.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 138, Issue 11 3684-3687, Copyright © 1987 by American Association of Immunologists

ARTICLES

Selective inhibition of the generation of T suppressor cells of contact sensitivity in vitro by interferon

J Knop, B Taborski and J DeMaeyer-Guignard

The T suppressor (Ts) cell response in contact sensitivity is preferentially inhibited by murine interferon-alpha, beta (IFN-alpha, beta) in vivo. Previous studies in vivo have suggested that IFN exerts its effect directly on the Ts subpopulation rather than through an effect on antigen-presenting macrophages. Nevertheless, the mechanism of this selective blockade remained unclear. To better define the mechanism(s) of inhibition of suppression by IFN-alpha, beta, we determined whether IFN acted on lymphocytes, macrophages, or both. Antigen-specific T effector cells of delayed-type hypersensitivity (TDH) and Ts cells were induced in vitro by co-culture of spleen lymphocytes with bone marrow-derived antigen-presenting macrophages (BM- MA) pulse-labeled with 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonate (DNBSO3). TDH or Ts activity was demonstrated by transfer of the lymphocytes into naive recipient BALB/c mice after 3 days of culture. BM-MA cultured for 5 to 7 days (BM-MA d5-7) before labeling preferentially activated TDH cells (Thy-1+, Lyt-1+2-); 10- to 14-day-old BM-MA (BM-MA d10) induced Ts cells (Thy-1+, Lyt-2+), as previously shown. Treatment of the spleen lymphocyte suspension with pure mouse IFN-alpha, beta at a dose of 10(3) U/10(8) cells completely blocked the induction of Ts cells but had no effect on the induction of TDH cells. Pretreatment of the antigen-presenting BM-MA for 24 hr with IFN (10(2) U/3 X 10(5) cells) had no effect on the induction of Ts and TDH cells. Cultivation of lymphocytes on a DNP-BM-MA d6 monolayer did not result in the induction of Ts cells; however, in the presence of a goat anti-murine IFN-alpha, beta antibody, Ts cells were induced. This finding indicates that the spontaneous release of IFN-alpha, beta in those cultures prevented the induction of Ts cells. These results confirm our previous observation that Ts cells are more easily blocked by IFN-alpha, beta than TDH cells, and demonstrate that IFN affects the Ts subpopulation not via modulation of the antigen-presenting macrophages. IFN-alpha, beta- producing, antigen-presenting, or accessory cells may therefore prevent the activation of this type of Ts cell.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1987 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1987 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.