The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortaldo, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Herberman, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ortaldo, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Herberman, R. B.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 137, Issue 9 2857-2863, Copyright © 1986 by American Association of Immunologists

ARTICLES

Analysis of cytostatic/cytotoxic lymphokines: relationship of natural killer cytotoxic factor to recombinant lymphotoxin, recombinant tumor necrosis factor, and leukoregulin

JR Ortaldo, JR Ransom, TJ Sayers and RB Herberman

Previous results that were obtained by using supernatants from the co- culture of human peripheral blood lymphocytes and the natural killer susceptible cell line K562 strongly inhibited the growth of various tumor cell lines. No correlation was observed between the susceptibility of the target cell lines to growth inhibition and to lysis by natural killer cells. Rather the spectrum of cytostatic activity and the characteristics of the soluble factor were similar to those of leukoregulin (LRG), a recently described lymphokine. Because of the recent availability of recombinant tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and lymphotoxin (LT), we compare the target selectivity and mechanism of action of these (TNF, LT, LRG) factors with natural killer cytotoxic factor (NKCF). The pattern of target cell susceptibility to growth inhibition or cytolysis by the factors were quite distinct from the pattern observed when cells were exposed to NKCF. Furthermore, antibodies to rLT or rTNF had no effect on LRG cytostasis or NKCF lysis, arguing against a requirement for or synergistic interaction with low levels of LT or TNF. Some of the targets susceptible to LRG were growth inhibited but were not lysed, thereby distinguishing it from NKCF. Furthermore, LRG cytostasis was not inhibited by mannose-6- PO4 or rabbit antibodies to granule cytolysin, both of which block natural killer cytotoxic factor. Therefore, LRG appears to be a cytostatic factor produced by large granular lymphocytes in response to K562 that is distinct from NKCF, TNF, and LT. In addition, NKCF, rLT, rTNF, and LRG, although having cytotoxic/cytostatic activity, are distinct functional factors and may represent a family of lytic factors.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1986 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1986 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.